By Kristen S. Scammon and Kenneth C. Sullivan
The recent federal indictment of baseball’s falling star Roger Clemens for lying under oath to Congress when he denied using performance-enhancing drugs should be a reminder to high-profile athletes and white collar executives alike that the cover-up can be far worse than the underlying conduct. Government prosecutors can—and do—bring perjury and false statement charges without ever charging the individual with the underlying conduct that was the focus of their investigation. Clemens has never been charged with using illegal, performance-enhancing drugs, and may never have faced prosecution had he not voluntarily testified before Congress. He now faces a maximum 30-year prison term and a $1.5 million fine.
Other high-profile individuals have suffered similar fates in recent years, including Lewis “Scooter” Libby, who was found guilty in 2007 of lying about his role in leaking an undercover CIA officer’s identity. Libby was convicted of perjury, obstructing a government investigation, and making false statements to the FBI. Libby was sentenced to 30 months in prison, two years of probation, and a $250,000 fine, even though he was never charged with leaking the information. In Massachusetts, Thomas Finneran, former Speaker of the Massachusetts House of Representatives, was indicted on three counts of perjury and one count of obstruction of justice, accused of giving false testimony under oath in a civil suit brought by voting rights groups seeking to overturn a controversial redistricting plan. Finneran agreed to plead guilty to obstruction of justice in exchange for the government’s dropping the perjury charges. Along with a $25,000 fine, he later lost his $500,000-a-year job, had his state pension suspended, and was stripped of his license to practice law.
Perjury charges are not reserved for the famous and powerful; the government also makes examples of ordinary citizens who give statements or testify during investigations. In 2009, federal prosecutors indicted Erica Boylan—a 31-year-old Boston Fire Department human resources clerk responsible for processing disability pension applications—for lying to a federal grand jury when she denied under oath that firefighters asked her to help them collect more pay by stalling the processing of their pension applications. Boylan plead guilty to both perjury and obstruction of justice, and was sentenced to two years of probation and 200 hours of community service.
Federal prosecutors have a number of powerful weapons to use against individuals they believe made a false statement, whether a statement was made while under oath in an official proceeding, or during interviews with government agents or prosecutors.
Statements made while under oath during an official proceeding, such as in court, before a grand jury, before a Congressional committee or at a deposition, are prosecuted under the federal perjury statutes. Each perjury count carries a maximum five-year prison term and/or a fine up to $250,000.
The federal false statement statute allows prosecutors to file criminal charges for false statements made outside of such official proceedings, where the defendant was not under oath, so long as the statement concerns a matter within the jurisdiction of a government agency or department and is made to a government representative, such as an FBI agent, a federal prosecutor, or an IRS official. Each false statement count also carries a maximum five-year prison term and a $250,000 fine.
Although perjury and false statement cases are not always easy for the government to prove, that does not stop prosecutors from trying. Anyone called to testify under oath or give a statement to a government investigator should keep the following rules in mind to minimize the risk that something they say can later be used to prosecute them for either perjury or false statements:
Although high-profile perjury prosecutions of famous athletes and high-level government insiders might seem far removed from everyday business, in this age of increased government oversight, corporate executives and others who testify under oath or respond to questions from government investigators should tread cautiously to avoid later accusations of perjury or false statements. The government can, and will, bring such charges and seek strict penalties, including imprisonment, even where no underlying crime was committed.
R. Robert Popeo
Chairman
(617) 348-1716
RRPopeo@mintz.com
Tracy A. Miner
Chair, White Collar Defense Practice
(617) 348-1694
TMiner@mintz.com
Peter A. Biagetti
(617) 348-4472
PABiagetti@mintz.com
Peter A. Chavkin
(212) 692-6231
PChavkin@mintz.com
Michael F. Connolly
(617) 348-4448
MFConnolly@mintz.com
Thomas S. Crane
(617) 348-1676
TSCrane@mintz.com
Robert Delahunt, Jr.
(617) 348-4480
RMDelahunt@mintz.com
Hope S. Foster
(202) 661-8758
HSFoster@mintz.com
Michael S. Gardener
(617) 348-1642
MSGardener@mintz.com
John K. Markey
(617) 348-1686
JMarkey@mintz.com
Joseph P. Messina
(617) 348-1631
JMessina@mintz.com
Bridget M. Rohde
(212) 692-6883
BMRohde@mintz.com
Benjamin B. Tymann
(617) 210-6853
BBTymann@mintz.com
Francis X. Bellotti
(617) 348-1606
FXBellotti@mintz.com
Garrett G. Gillespie
(617) 348-4499
GGGillespie@mintz.com
Kristen S. Scammon
(617) 348-4429
KSScammon@mintz.com
Eoin P. Beirne
(617) 348-1707
EPBeirne@mintz.com
Helen Gerostathos Guyton
(202) 434-7385
HGGuyton@mintz.com
Matthew D. Levitt
(617) 348-1646
MDLevitt@mintz.com
Jennifer J. Mather
(617) 348-4462
JJMather@mintz.com
Jessica C. Sergi
(617) 348-1766
JCSergi@mintz.com
McKenzie E. Webster
(617) 210-6856
MWebster@mintz.com