By Jonathan T. Cain, Richard G. Gervase, David E. Johnson, Muriel M. Liberto, and Tali M. Tuchin
Last week the United States Supreme Court clarified the respective invention ownership rights between federal contractors and their employee inventors under the Bayh-Dole Act (35 U.S.C. §§201(e), (c), 202(a)) (“Act”) in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. (Sup. Ct. June 6, 2011). This case has implications on compliance with federal contracts and the practice of technology transfer, and should increase the scrutiny given invention assignment agreements between acquisition targets and their employee inventors.
Mintz Levin Attorney Megan N. Gates Appointed Co-Chair Of BBA Business Transactions Section
© 1994-2012 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.
This website may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this website does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this web site nor transmissions between you and Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC through this web site are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship. Images or photography appearing on this website may not be actual attorneys or images associated with Mintz Levin.
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership ("LLP") authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority No. 406593 and registered in England & Wales, No. OC305196. A full list of members, who are either solicitors or registered foreign lawyers, is open to inspection at the registered office, Alder Castle, 10 Noble Street, London EC2V 7JX Tel: +44 (0) 20 7776 7300. Fax: +44 (0) 20 7776 7301.
